Tuesday, June 17, 2008

What Tim Russert and Francisco Franco Have in Common

I liked Tim Russert, heard him go back and forth with Don Imus on numerous occasions. He was unfailingly good-natured, informative, and gave every impression of being, as one obituary described him, “the happy warrior.”

But still…

The media coverage of his unfortunate and unexpected death last week is what we might expect if the Pope, Queen Elizabeth, the Dali Lama, and Tiger Woods were killed by Osama bin Laden using a knife made from the bones of decapitated Christian virgins, anointed with the blood of aborted fetuses and handed to him by Satan personally.

Russert was well known, well liked, and highly respected in his field. It was proper for the NBC family to set aside a segment on each of their news shows for him; no one would find fault with making Sunday’s Meet the Press into a sympathetic retrospective. In fact, NBC dedicated virtually every news show to him; coverage of the US Open golf tournament showed Russert’s visage at every station break. MSNBC committed just about every show, throughout the weekend. Other news outlets, while not as extensive as Russert’s peers at NBC, were also exhaustive in their coverage.

Tim Russert, for all his fine qualities, was never the news. He was one of many who told us about the news. He was one of the best, and had been for a long time, but he was but the lens through which important events were displayed. For the media to invest this much energy in one of their own is a disturbing insight into how they view themselves. Acting as guardians of the First Amendment isn’t enough; the media have become the story, distorting the relative importance of events through their observation.

How might things have been different if this much energy had been expended verifying the Bush Administration’s claims for going to war in Iraq? Or any number of its other policies in the aftermath of 9/11? Too controversial, most likely. Sentiment is safer.


Corbett said...

I wonder if the networks will give the same level of treatment to Cronkite when he kicks it. If there's a journalist who actually deserves round-the-clock coverage for a day or two, he'd be the one.

Oh, and by the way, Reagan and Bob Hope are still dead.

Peter Rozovsky said...

That's an interesting bit of speculation from the previous commenter about whether Cronkite will get the network (and, I might add, newspaper) coverage Russert is getting. Quite naturally, he deserves far more than Russert does. Will he get it? He was more influential and important than Russert, but will he be considered too passé to merit a Russertian outpouring?

My newspaper's overcoverage of Russert made me sick. And then, in a piece of unintentional satire, the paper's main television commentator was scheduled to appear on one of the TV news shows to discuss -- media coverage of the death of Tim Russert.
Detectives Beyond Borders
"Because Murder Is More Fun Away From Home"